You should not add an initial that was not present in the original publication or expand initials into full names if the author used initials. One reason is the one Peter Jansson gives, namely that the bibliography should reflect what was actually published. However, there's another reason I find even more compelling: respect for the author's choice of name.
Editing another person's name is presumptuous. Like many people, I have deliberately chosen the version of my name I use in papers, and I care about this aspect of my professional identity. What my passport says or what I'm called in person are irrelevant, and I would not be happy to have citations edited to use what someone else thinks is a better (or more formal, or more complete) version of my name than the one I chose to publish under. If my paper says Alice P. Liddell, then nobody has any business deciding I should be called Alice Pleasance Liddell instead.
In particular, your desire for completeness or consistency should not outweigh the author's autonomy to choose their own professional name, and you should not overrule a deliberate choice. Of course, some people aren't picky about what they're called, and they may publish using several random variants of their name. It can be tempting to standardize the name for the sake of consistency, but you should avoid doing so unless you know the author wouldn't mind. If you don't know the author personally, it's hard to distinguish between an author who doesn't care and one whose preferences have changed over time, and it's not reasonable to rely on your own guess as to how to handle this. (For example, if someone adds an initial due to marriage, they might be displeased to see it retroactively applied as if it had always been their name.)
There can also be political aspects of naming. For example, some women publish under initials to avoid drawing attention to their gender. I'm not convinced this makes a difference, but who am I to unilaterally undo it by replacing the initials with identifiably female names?
To summarize, names can be a sensitive subject. Every paper comes with the names chosen by the authors at the time of publication. If you're going to modify these names, you'd better have a good reason.
List of best books about developmental psychology, including jacket cover images when available. All these popular books on developmental psychology are sorted by popularity, so the highest rated books are at the top of the list. This well-researched developmental psychology bibliography includes out-of-print titles and generally contains the most popular, famous, or otherwise notable books - fiction or non-fiction - about developmental psychology. If you're looking for a list of top books on developmental psychology then you're in the right place.
This list includes Dyslogic Syndrome, Man, Beast and Zombie and more. You should be able to answer the question, "What are the best books about Developmental psychology?" after checking out this list.This greatest developmental psychology book list contains various bits of information, such as the author's names and what genre the books fall under. Most of these developmental psychology books can be bought on Amazon with one easy click.
Robert S. Feldman and Laura E. Berk are among the authors who have written books about Developmental psychology in their lifetime.